Coquet Island SPA
Puffin (seabird assemblage component only)
- The source information regarding puffin disturbance mortality from other relevant projects is given in Table 5.65 Open ▸ .
Table 5.65: Puffin Disturbance Mortalities Apportioned to the Coquet Island SPA From Other Relevant Projects
- From this information, the various approaches have been consolidated into a “low” and a “high” estimate for the total in-combination impact. This is presented in Table 5.66 Open ▸ .
Table 5.66: Puffin Displacement Mortalities Apportioned to the Coquet Island SPA In-Combination Totals
- With a population of 50,058 breeding adults (Burnell et al., 2023), 3.3 to 42.1 additional mortalities represents a 0.007 to 0.084 percentage point increase in mortality rates. Therefore, PVA has been carried out to further assess the total in-combination impact.
- The PVA results are summarised in Table 5.67 Open ▸ . Full details are available in appendix 3B.
Table 5.67: Summary of PVA Results for In-Combination Displacement Impacts on Puffin at the Coquet Island SPA
- The puffin population of the Coquet Island SPA has increased significantly between its citation level of 31,686 breeding adults and recent counts of 50,058 breeding adults (Burnell et al., 2023).
- Whilst the PVA results indicate a significant population decline from the current level even under the counterfactual scenario, given the positive growth observed at this site in recent years, that outcome is considered implausible for this site and so the assessment relies on the CPS and CGR. The limitations of the PVA model and available demographic parameters to specify as inputs mean that CPS and CGR are considered the most reliable metrics, as further detailed in appendix 3B. The median CGR is, for all scenarios and approaches, 0.999 to 1.000 which indicates the population growth rate declines by 0.1% or less. After 35 years (the expected lifespan of the Array), the CPS ranges from 0.965 to 0.997. Overall, therefore, the impact of displacement from the Array in combination with other projects is predicted to make no material impact on the puffin population compared to the counterfactual scenario.
Breeding Seabird Assemblage
- Of the components of the seabird assemblage, puffin was the only species for which a potential LSE2 was identified. As detailed above, there is expected to be no significant impact on the puffin population. Therefore, it can also be concluded, beyond reasonable scientific doubt, that there is no potential for an AEOI to the seabird assemblage feature of the Coquet Island SPA as a result of displacement from the Array in combination with other developments.
East Caithness Cliffs SPA
Kittiwake
- The source information regarding kittiwake disturbance mortality from other relevant projects is given in Table 5.68 Open ▸ .
Table 5.68: Kittiwake Displacement Mortalities Apportioned to the East Caithness Cliffs SPA from Other Relevant Projects
- From this information, the various approaches have been consolidated into a “low” and a “high” estimate for the total in-combination impact. This is presented in Table 5.69 Open ▸ .
Table 5.69: Kittiwake Displacement Mortalities Apportioned to the East Caithness Cliffs SPA In-Combination Totals
- With a population of 48,958 breeding adults (Burnell et al, 2023), 55.0 to 179.7 additional mortalities represent a 0.112 to 0.367 percentage point increase in mortality rates. Therefore, PVA has been carried out both with and without Berwick Bank Offshore Wind Farm and for the high and low scenarios, to further assess the total in-combination impact.
- The PVA results are summarised in Table 5.70 Open ▸ . Full details are available in appendix 3B.
Table 5.70: Summary of PVA results for In-Combination Displacement Impacts on Kittiwake at the East Caithness Cliffs SPA
- The kittiwake population of the East Caithness Cliffs SPA has declined slightly from its citation level of 65,000 breeding adults, with recent counts of 48,958 breeding adults (Burnell et al., 2023), although it is assessed as being in “Favourable Maintained” condition (NatureScot, ND).
- The PVA results show that the kittiwake population is expected to remain relatively stable under the counterfactual (no impact) scenario. Under the impacted scenarios, the CGR is 0.999 under the “low” approach (whether including or excluding the impact of Berwick Bank Offshore Wind Farm) and 0.996 under the “high” approach (whether including or excluding the impact of Berwick Bank Offshore Wind Farm). This leads to a CPS after 35 years of 0.855 to 0.954 – i.e. the population size would be 4.6% to 14.5% smaller than the counterfactual population size.
- Whilst this level of impact is small, it is not negligible and in the context of a population that is already declining, the additional mortality from the Array in combination with other projects and plans would appear to have the potential to adversely affect the likelihood of the site meeting its conservation objectives for all assessment scenarios and both with and without Berwick Bank Offshore Wind Farm. Therefore, it is concluded that there is a potential AEOI to the kittiwake feature of the East Caithness Cliffs SPA as a result of displacement impacts from the Array in-combination with other developments.